Forfeiture of a Commercial Lease
Expert Guidance on the Forfeiture Process
Forfeiting a commercial lease can be complex, with strict requirements for landlords to reclaim possession when a tenant breaches the terms of their lease. At Osbornes Law, our commercial property experts specialise in guiding landlords through the forfeiture process.
Contact
A landlord has the right to forfeit a lease under specific conditions, allowing them to re-enter the property if the tenant breaches a lease provision (a covenant). Depending on the type of breach, the landlord may reclaim possession immediately through ‘peaceable re-entry’ or after providing notice. Alternatively, the landlord can initiate court proceedings for forfeiture after serving notice, or immediately in cases of non-payment of rent.
Forfeiting a Lease
To successfully forfeit a lease, a landlord must establish their right to do so, typically based on a specific breached covenant. However, caution is essential; if a lease is forfeited without a valid right, the tenant can claim wrongful forfeiture. Therefore, it’s crucial to seek legal advice immediately after a breach occurs.
Before forfeiting a lease, a landlord should carefully consider the following questions:
- Is forfeiting the lease the right course of action given the circumstances?
- Will taking back possession offer any real benefit?
- What is the current state of the rental market? (Will the landlord be able to secure a new tenant quickly?)
- Are there any guarantors or other forms of security, such as a rent deposit, that could be used to cover any outstanding rent arrears?
- Can the property be secured? (Is there a risk of squatters occupying the property if it remains vacant?)
- Does the property have potential for development, or would it benefit from being developed?
Right to Forfeit
Once the right to forfeit is confirmed—except in cases of unpaid rent—the landlord must follow a statutory notice procedure and serve a written notice under Section 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925. This notice must include:
- Details of the breach
- Instructions on how the tenant can remedy the breach within a reasonable timeframe (if it’s possible to remedy)
- The amount of compensation the tenant must pay for the breach
The notice must comply with the specific provisions outlined in the lease.
If the tenant does not remedy the breach or fails to provide satisfactory compensation within the specified time, the landlord may either peaceably re-enter the property or initiate court proceedings to seek forfeiture of the lease.
Peaceable Re-Entry
Peaceable re-entry refers to the process by which a landlord regains physical possession of a property. The term “peaceable” pertains to the conduct of the person carrying out the re-entry, not necessarily the property itself. While a landlord may use some force in re-entering the property (such as changing locks or securing access points), the force should be reasonable and not excessive. It is a criminal offence to use violence to regain possession if there is a tenant or occupant present who objects to the re-entry.
When regaining possession, the landlord must ensure that the actions are clear and unmistakable. This typically involves taking steps to prevent the tenant from re-entering, such as changing the locks and securing entrances or open areas to the extent possible.
In commercial property, it is common for re-entry to occur outside business hours when the property is more likely to be vacant, making the process smoother and less contentious.
A landlord may also choose to hire a certified bailiff to carry out the re-entry on their behalf.
Once re-entry has been completed, the landlord should post a clear, visible notice on the property. While there is no prescribed form for this notice, it is advisable to include the following information:
- A statement confirming that the landlord has forfeited the lease by re-entering the property.
- A reference to the specific lease clause that allows the landlord to forfeit the lease.
- A declaration that only individuals authorised by the landlord may lawfully enter the premises, and any unauthorised attempts to do so will be considered a criminal offence.
- Full property details and contact information for the landlord or their agent.
Forfeiture by Legal Proceedings
If a landlord chooses to initiate forfeiture proceedings, this serves as a clear indication of their intent to regain possession of the property. However, the lease will only terminate once the court issues a possession order (if the court grants it), and any such order will typically have retroactive effect.
The Civil Procedure Rules outline specific steps for applying to the court for a forfeiture order. These procedures differ depending on whether the property in question is commercial or residential.
Losing the Right to Forfeit
A landlord can unintentionally lose the right to forfeit a lease by taking actions that acknowledge its ongoing validity. This occurs when the landlord, or someone acting on their behalf with knowledge of the circumstances warranting forfeiture, unequivocally recognizes the lease’s continued existence and communicates this to the tenant.
Typically, this involves the landlord or their agent demanding rent that becomes due after a breach of covenant has occurred. The impact of this action depends on whether the breach is considered ‘once and for all’ or ‘continuing.’ A continuing breach can survive an action that waives the right to forfeit, while a once-and-for-all breach cannot.
Additionally, an insolvency event, such as a tenant entering administration, may limit the right to forfeit, even if the landlord has already initiated forfeiture proceedings.
Common mistakes Landlords make during Forfeiture
Failing to Check the Lease
Before attempting to forfeit a lease, landlords must ensure the lease includes an express forfeiture clause. Such a clause is not implied by default and must specifically cover the alleged breach. Failing to verify that the lease includes the appropriate forfeiture provisions can expose landlords to legal risks.
Not Following the Correct Procedure
When the tenant breaches a covenant, other than non-payment of rent, landlords are required to serve a notice and allow the tenant a reasonable period to remedy the breach, if possible. Skipping this notice step or giving the tenant an unrealistic timeframe to fix the issue, can lead to complications. Even in cases where the breach seems irremediable, the landlord is still obligated to serve the proper notice. This notice must follow the specific form outlined in Section 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925.
Recognising the Continued Existence of the Lease
Landlords may inadvertently waive their right to forfeit the lease by acknowledging that the lease remains in effect. This is particularly problematic in cases of ‘once and for all’ breaches (e.g., unlawful assignment or subletting), as opposed to ‘continuing breaches’ (e.g., failure to maintain or repair the property). In the case of a continuing breach, a new forfeiture right arises each day the breach persists. If a landlord is deemed to have waived their right to forfeit due to acknowledging a once-and-for-all breach, they will not be able to forfeit the lease again unless the tenant breaches the lease terms anew.
Failing to Consider Alternatives or Financial Implications
While it may be tempting to regain possession of the property through forfeiture, landlords should consider alternative options such as mediation or negotiating with the tenant, which could lead to a more mutually agreeable resolution. Additionally, landlords should carefully assess the financial consequences of forfeiture, including the costs of legal proceedings, potential business rates on a vacant property, and the difficulty of finding a new tenant in a challenging market. If the tenant successfully claims wrongful or illegal forfeiture, the landlord could face substantial damages for loss of use of the premises.
Conclusion
In conclusion, forfeiting a commercial lease is a complex process that requires careful consideration of both legal rights and obligations. Whether you are a landlord seeking to reclaim possession of a property or a tenant facing potential forfeiture, understanding the statutory requirements and procedural steps is essential to avoid costly mistakes. At Osbornes Law, we offer expert legal support to navigate the forfeiture process, ensuring that your interests are protected and that all necessary procedures are followed. Whether you’re pursuing forfeiture or seeking relief from it, our team is committed to providing clear, strategic guidance every step of the way.
How Osbornes Law Can Help with Forfeiture of Commercial Leases
We provide comprehensive guidance on the forfeiture process, including:
- Reviewing the lease
- Assessing whether the right to forfeit exists
- Preparing and serving the Section 146 notice
- Coordinating with agents for peaceful re-entry to the property
- Initiating court proceedings
- Facilitating the enforcement of a possession order once obtained
Our commercial property solicitors also often represents tenants, providing advice on the potential wrongful forfeiture by landlords and initiating proceedings to seek relief from forfeiture. If successful, this process effectively reinstates the lease as though it had never been forfeited.
To speak with one of our property litigation solicitors, contact us by:
- Filling in our online enquiry form; or
- Calling us on 020 7485 8811
FAQs
What is forfeiture of a commercial lease?
Forfeiture is legal action taken by a landlord to prematurely end the lease against the tenant’s wishes. This usually happens because the tenant has failed to pay rent or has breached one of the material conditions in the lease, such as the repair obligations or subletting without consent.
When does the landlord have a right to forfeit?
Forfeiture is a contractual right under the lease. The “forfeiture” or “proviso for re-entry” clause in the lease will specify the circumstances that allow the landlord to forfeit and exactly what steps the landlord needs to take.
Most leases will allow the landlord to forfeit for non-payment of rent or breach of other lease covenants. Some leases also permit re-entry in other specific instances, like tenant insolvency.
What is the forfeiture of lease process?
For breaches other than non-payment of rent, landlords must first serve a notice under Section 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925, giving the tenant a reasonable time to remedy the breach (or pay compensation if the breach cannot be remedied). If the tenant fails to comply with s.146 notice, the landlord can forfeit the lease by peaceable re-entry or start the process of obtaining a court order.
Deciding what a “reasonable period” is can be tricky. Most landlords consult specialist property litigation solicitors before serving the notice, because getting it wrong could render the notice invalid.
What is peaceable re-entry?
Forfeiture by peaceable re-entry is the act of physically entering the property and changing the locks. No court proceedings are involved in this process. Landlords prefer this option due to its simplicity and speed.
Is it better to get a court order or forfeit by peaceable re-entry?
Landlords must be very sure that they have a right to forfeit a lease by peaceable re-entry, or they could face an expensive claim for unlawful eviction. Some problems that might crop up:
- Forgetting grace periods – commercial leases oftenallow tenants an additional 7, 14 or 21 days to pay rent before the legal right to forfeit arises. Forfeiting too early is an unlawful eviction.
- Waiving the right to forfeit – Accepting a partial offer of payment or acting as if the lease is still continuing after a breach has occurred can be seen as waiving the right to forfeit the lease.
- Incorrect process – If there’s someone physically present at the property who opposes the re-entry, the landlord risks committing a criminal offence by changing the locks.
The other option involves making a court application and obtaining a possession order from the court. Court proceedings are usually more appropriate if there is a dispute over sums owed or if the situation is complex, for example, the tenant is counterclaiming for breach of the landlord’s obligations.
Forfeiture by court proceedings is a lengthier and more complicated process than peaceable re-entry. However, the grant of a possession order provides a level of certainty for landlords.
Can forfeiture be challenged?
Forfeiture is regarded as an extreme remedy, and the law provides numerous protection to stop landlords from using it arbitrarily. The main avenue for a tenant to resist forfeiture is by claiming relief from forfeiture. While there is no guarantee that a judge will grant relief, the courts generally are willing to do so if the tenant pays all the arrears, pays the landlord’s costs, and the court is satisfied that the tenant can comply with the lease terms in the future.
Is there an alternative to commercial lease forfeiture?
For both landlords and tenants, forfeiture of the lease shouldn’t be the first option considered when facing difficulties. Negotiations and cooperation can often result in a commercial deal that allows the lease to continue on mutually beneficial terms.
We can also help landlords call on other available forms of security, such as a rent deposit or guarantees.
Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR) is also an option for landlords to recover rent arrears. This statutory process allows commercial landlords to take control of the tenant’s goods and sell them at auction to recoup unpaid rent.
Contact us about Forfeiture of Commercial Leases
Call us 020 7485 8811
Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you
Professional and communicative throughout the process of becoming a Freehold Company and having a share of said freehold. Both Amber and Siroop spoke in plain English and were most efficient and pleasant to deal with.
Amber was fantastic from start to finish. Efficient, clear and professional. Will certainly be calling on her again.
Guy and his team assisted me with a new lease venture and were an absolute pleasure to work with. A professional & knowledgeable team who offered fast and excellent advice. Highly recommend their services
Accreditations
Property News & InsightsVIEW ALL
- 27.8.2024
Pension Sharing Orders
Pension Sharing in Divorce With so many things to consider when dividing up your finances during a divorce or dissolution...
Read more - 1.8.2024
Common Law Partners
Common law partner meaning Common law marriage is the idea that two people who live together and act as if...
Read more - 25.7.2024
Cycling Accident Claims: Client Stories
Below are details of various cases handled by Osbornes specialist cycle accident claims team including the payouts clients have received...
Read more - 13.3.2024
Accident at Work Compensation Examples
Factory Worker Receives £14,000 for Hot Water Burns Our client was working in a food producing factory. He was injured when...
Read more - 4.12.2023
My spouse is going bankrupt. Will it affect...
Divorce and Bankruptcy In 2022, more than 1 in 10 businesses reported a moderate-to-severe risk of insolvency. More than one in five (22%) of...
Read more - 10.8.2023
Ambulance Delays Affecting Rapid Patient Treatment
Failure to Meet Ambulance Response Targets In 2017, the Secretary of State for Health accepted the new ambulance performance standards recommended...
Read more - 9.6.2023
High profile probate dispute of Vladimir Scherbakov
Probate dispute of Russian billionaire’s missing will You’d imagine a wealthy businessman with assets in different countries would...
Read more - 9.6.2023
Early Notification Scheme – is it helping or failing...
What is the Early Notification Scheme? The NHS Early Notification Scheme (“ENS”) has reached its sixth anniversary. Established in April 2017,...
Read more - 6.6.2023
Cyclists Claim After Hit-and-Run
Successful claim by cyclist injured after a hit-and-run In this hit-and-run claim, Our client had been playing volleyball in the...
Read more - 5.6.2023
Are pharmacy closures putting patients at risk?
It has been reported in the press that chemist closures will have an impact on patients living in deprived or...
Read more - 22.5.2023
Case Law: Dementia-Induced Mild Cognitive Impairment
Introduction Dementia is a harsh reality for increasing numbers of families. Sadly, it means the disputed wills solicitors at Osbornes...
Read more - 19.5.2023
Declaration of Trust for Property
If you are buying a property jointly, you may want to consider making a declaration of trust to record your...
Read more - 11.5.2023
Lease Extension Negligence
What is Lease Extension Negligence? Solicitors Negligence when a Tenant claims a new lease of a flat under the Leasehold...
Read more - 11.5.2023
Overlooking Nuisance Claims
The Supreme Court’s Ruling on Overlooking as Private Nuisance In the case Fearn v Tate (2023) UKSC 4, the UK Supreme...
Read more - 26.4.2023
German Court Rules on EU Succession Regulation
Succession laws vary from country to country which historically made the administration of cross-border estates potentially complex. Since 17 August 2015, the...
Read more - 21.4.2023
Success in Court of Appeal in child disability...
The Court of Appeal has today handed judgment in the case of Harrington v Secretary of State for Work and...
Read more - 11.4.2023
£250,000 settlement for client injured in forklift accident
Sophie Davies, a specialist personal injury lawyer at Osbornes Law, recently represented a client who suffered life-changing injuries following a...
Read more - 11.4.2023
Osbornes Instructed After Local Authority Data Breach
Osbornes Law has recently negotiated a settlement on behalf of two clients who had their personal information inadvertently released to...
Read more - 23.3.2023
Does Divorce Jurisdiction Matter?
Jurisdiction in divorce I am a family law practitioner with a large client following in England and in Gibraltar. I...
Read more - 23.3.2023
Private Pregnancy Scans and Substandard Care
In the news, it has been reported that private clinics that offer pregnancy scans to women are not meeting the...
Read more - 22.3.2023
Cohabitation Agreements
Unmarried couples who live together do not have the same legal protection as married couples and civil partners when they...
Read more - 22.3.2023
Breadwinner or homemaker in divorce. Does it matter?
Breadwinner vs Housewife Divorce Rights When it comes to deciding how wealth is split in a divorce, English courts do...
Read more - 22.3.2023
What is Parental Responsibility?
Understanding Parental Responsibility Parental responsibility is the legal term used to describe parents’ duties and responsibilities for their children. These...
Read more - 16.3.2023
Are trusts protected from divorce?
Can trusts protect an inheritance from your spouse? A trust is a separate legal entity. Neither spouse owns its assets....
Read more
The Team View the whole team
Claire Andrews
Partner
Family LawJan Atkinson
Partner
Wills, Probate and Disputed EstatesRachael Atkinson
Associate
Property LawRob Aylott
Partner
Personal Injury SolicitorsSuzanna Baker
Senior Associate
Wills, Probate and Disputed EstatesSam Collard
Partner
Personal Injury SolicitorsSophie Davies
Partner
Personal Injury SolicitorsKatie de Swarte
Senior Associate
Wills, Probate and Disputed EstatesWilliam Ford
Partner
Housing and Social CareMark Freedman
Partner
Family LawLauren Hall
Partner
Family LawStuart Kightley
Partner
Personal Injury SolicitorsMaria Kitsiou
Partner
Family LawShilpa Mathuradas
Partner
Property LitigationSiobhan McIvor
Partner
Personal Injury SolicitorsElspeth Neilson
Partner
Wills, Probate and Disputed EstatesJodi Newton
Senior Associate
Medical NegligenceSimon Nosworthy
Partner
Property LawGuy Osborn
Partner
Commercial PropertyLisa Pepper
Partner
Family LawBen Posford
Partner
Personal Injury SolicitorsStephanie Prior
Partner
Medical NegligenceMartin Ross
Partner
Family LawYael Selig
View the
whole team