Cohabitation Agreements
Unmarried couples who live together do not have the same legal protection as married couples and civil partners when they...
Read more“Jonathan is thorough, intelligent, hard-working and committed. He knows the law very well and is committed to the rights of children.”
Jonathan qualified as a Family solicitor in 2007 and holds the Law Society accreditation as a Children Panel member as a children’s representative. Jonathan is a solicitor advocate giving him additional cognizance into how the Courts and child protection professionals respond to applications concerning children.
He has extensive expertise in complex public law children matters involving complex medical evidence, criminality, mental health concerns, sexual/ physical abuse and multi jurisdictional aspects. He is regularly instructed by parents, guardians as well as children directly.
He has a wealth of experience in resolving child arrangements acting for parents, 16.4 guardians or other family members. His cases include the relocation of children, substance misuse, emotional and physical abuse, international proceedings involving children, alienation, and wardship.
He speaks conversational Spanish.
Acting for mother in private law proceedings
FTF v MWM (Rev1) [2023] EWFC 191 (03 November 2023)
Lasting over 4 years. Issues involved domestic abuse, conduct, s91(14) barring orders and costs.
Acting for father in case proceedings
London Borough of Ealing v Mother & Ors [2023] EWFC 201 (15 November 2023)
At the outset of the final hearing the father supported by the LA sought the making of a child arrangements order in favour of the father on the basis that the child would be placed into a boarding school environment living with the father either in the UK and in a non Hague Convention Country. The child had a strong opposition to moving into a boarded environment and the guardian considered the child’s welfare required appropriate allowance for his clear views given his age and level of understanding and the father and LA acceded to this position though the course of the hearing It was agreed contact would be generous and liberal when compared to many cases in which a care order is made.
Acting for child in DOLS
London Borough of Lambeth v AB & Ors [2024] EWHC 571 (Fam) (31 January 2024)
Jonathan represented a child TC directly in an application for a Deprivation of Liberty order (DOLS) in relation to his client. He successfully argued that the restrictions on TC should not continue and LB Lambeth were named and criticised for their failings in their application of an earlier DOLS order
"Jon guided and supported us through an incredibly difficult time in our lives. He is dedicated, kind and excellent at his job. In a time of confusion and stress, Jon was calm, dedicated and supportive. I would highly recommend him."
"My matters were dealt with by Mr Jonathan Jonas with sincerity and extreme sensitivity throughout my entire procedure. I felt that the attention Mr Jonas gave to my case was exceptional and am so relieved that he was available for me and my daughter."
"We sought legal support in relation to an initial child protection situation and while other solicitors we had reached out to either provided a run down of legal material otherwise available online or commented that solicitor involvement would only be necessary if matters were escalated by the local authority, Jon went well beyond that and provided what we really needed and with reasonable costs, listening carefully to the situation and providing guidance on how best to approach the matter based on his significant experience. This was immensely helpful in a situation that was very stressful for us."
"I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend Jon and team for the work they did in my relocation/child arrangements case. Jon’s approach is professional and diligent, but with a very human essence. He genuinely wants the best outcome for his client and the child(ren) involved. I’m truly grateful for the support he has given me throughout my litigation journey and the outcomes achieved for our case."
"Jonathan was great. He lead me through a very difficult process and I felt I was in safe and sympathetic yet pragmatic hands throughout. I felt he took all my concerns on board, listened without judgment gave clear advice and direction, was hugely reassuring and delivered a meticulously responsive service whilst minimising costs to a sensible level which is sadly all too often not the case in emotive Children Act matters. I would recommend him (and have done) without hesitation."
"Jon guided and supported us through an incredibly difficult time in our lives. He is dedicated, kind and excellent at his job. In a time of confusion and stress, Jon was calm, dedicated and supportive. I would highly recommend him."
"My matters were dealt with by Mr Jonathan Jonas with sincerity and extreme sensitivity throughout my entire procedure. I felt that the attention Mr Jonas gave to my case was exceptional and am so relieved that he was available for me and my daughter."
"We sought legal support in relation to an initial child protection situation and while other solicitors we had reached out to either provided a run down of legal material otherwise available online or commented that solicitor involvement would only be necessary if matters were escalated by the local authority, Jon went well beyond that and provided what we really needed and with reasonable costs, listening carefully to the situation and providing guidance on how best to approach the matter based on his significant experience. This was immensely helpful in a situation that was very stressful for us."
"I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend Jon and team for the work they did in my relocation/child arrangements case. Jon’s approach is professional and diligent, but with a very human essence. He genuinely wants the best outcome for his client and the child(ren) involved. I’m truly grateful for the support he has given me throughout my litigation journey and the outcomes achieved for our case."
"Jonathan was great. He lead me through a very difficult process and I felt I was in safe and sympathetic yet pragmatic hands throughout. I felt he took all my concerns on board, listened without judgment gave clear advice and direction, was hugely reassuring and delivered a meticulously responsive service whilst minimising costs to a sensible level which is sadly all too often not the case in emotive Children Act matters. I would recommend him (and have done) without hesitation."
Family InsightsVIEW ALL
Unmarried couples who live together do not have the same legal protection as married couples and civil partners when they...
Read moreThis issue was in the news recently, when a married Oklahoma same-sex couple were in court over a dispute about...
Read moreOne of the reasons I am still passionate about family law, after 20 years in the field, is that it is...
Read moreA review of a recent case concerning consent during fertility treatment. When going through fertility treatment as a couple, it...
Read moreRecently in the news has been the outcome of the case of Osborne & Anor v Cambridgeshire County Council [2022] EWHC 1982 (...
Read moreIn July 2022, the Department of Health for England released its strategy aimed at improving Women’s Health. While women represent 51%...
Read moreThe Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has proposed changes to the law surrounding gamete donor anonymity in the UK....
Read moreIs arbitration or mediation better in a divorce? Few divorcing couples want to end up in court, which is why...
Read moreThe Importance of Getting Permission Before Taking a Child Abroad Taking a child abroad requires more than just booking flights...
Read moreWhat Are My Surrogacy Options at Home and Abroad? When you’re considering surrogacy as an intended parent, you may...
Read moreMost adoption applications go through smoothly and it is only in the minority of cases that birth parents seek to...
Read moreFollowing campaigning by those working in the fertility sector and public consultation in 2020, the Government announced on 6th September 2021 that...
Read moreContesting a prenup Kanye West and Kim Kardashian are getting a divorce after nearly seven years of marriage. According to...
Read moreAdopting a baby from Russia can give a chance of a family to a child who would otherwise spend their...
Read moreIntroduction to Gow v Grant [2012] UKSC 29 Gow v Grant [2012] UKSC 29 is a decision of the Supreme Court dealing with the...
Read moreDoes cohabiting with a new partner affect child support? – Case Law The case X v Y (Maintenance Arrears: Cohabitation) (2012) considered...
Read moreThis week, a story reported by the Telegraph raises some interesting questions about international surrogacy. The reporting states that a 28...
Read moreOn 20th October 2010, the highest court in the land had the final say in one of the most eagerly awaited...
Read more