14.7.2022
20 Years of Celebrating Legal Aid Lawyers
This year the litigation team at Osbornes attended the 20th anniversary of the Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year 2022 (“LALY 2022”)...
Read moreCourt of Appeal Dismisses Legacy Benefits Claim
Table of Contents
The Court of Appeal has today dismissed the legacy benefit Claimants’ appeal of the decision of the High Court dated 18 February 2022, which had refused the Claimants’ claim for judicial review.
The Court made specific reference to the uncontested expert evidence put forward by the Claimants from academics, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, and the Resolution Foundation. This demonstrated that there was no evidence to suggest that new Universal Credit (“UC”) claimants in greater need of increased subsistence benefit than existing UC claimants or those on legacy benefits (which had been one of the key reasons put forward by the government for the policy to focus on UC). The evidence also demonstrated that there was no economic purpose to the difference in treatment between those on UC and those on legacy benefits.
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (“SSWP”) had argued that they could not alleviate all hardship during the pandemic, and that essentially the decision to focus on new UC Claimants was a political decision that the Court’s should not interfere with. The SSWP argued that the measure to uplift UC was not done so as to alleviate financial difficulties for all individuals experiencing hardship during the pandemic. It was argued that the measure was part of a raft of policies designed to reduce the effects of the pandemic on the labour market. Essentially the government admitted that it’s focus in bringing in the uplift during the pandemic was not to assist disabled persons, and it accepted that this group would be hard hit by the pandemic.
The Court of Appeal accepted that people on legacy benefits such as the Claimants had been treated less favourably as a group. It was also accepted that there was indirect discrimination on the grounds of disability. The question then was whether that difference of treatment could be justified. However, on this point, whilst the Court accepted that those on legacy benefits were “undoubtedly vulnerable”, the government had made a hard choice to prioritise those in the labour market, who they anticipated would become unemployed as a result of the pandemic.
The Court noted that the policy objective of the SSWP was different to the policy objective advanced by the Claimants. The Claimants had argued that in effect the decision to uplift UC was an anti-poverty measure, but the Court of Appeal found that, whilst this was one objective, it had other objectives, including alleviating financial disruption as a result of the pandemic.
The judgment also acknowledges that the rates of legacy benefits are low and that any person required to live on that level of income would experience hardship. However, as the SSWP’s policy rationale was not to alleviate poverty as a result of the pandemic, the Court of Appeal found that this was a distinct issue to the SSWP’s justification for the decision to uplift UC. The Court of Appeal judgment ends by expressing sympathy for the position of those on legacy benefits, but ultimately the Court of Appeal did not consider there had been any legal error made by the High Court in its earlier judgment.
William Ford, the solicitor who represented the claimants comments:
“I appreciate that this outcome will be a great disappointment to many people on legacy benefits who have been waiting patiently for this judgment. All possible effort was made to persuade the Court of Appeal to reach a different outcome and it is deeply disappointing that this did not prove possible. All that remains for me to do is give thanks to the Claimants for being willing to bring this challenge to the government, as well as to their barristers, Jamie Burton KC and Desmond Rutledge, who so ably put forward the legal arguments on their behalf.”
William is a partner in the housing and social care department at Osbornes Law.
Share this article
William Ford is experienced in representing tenants in disrepair and possession claims, as well as homelessness appeals and judicial reviews concerning allocation of housing.
"He has a really good eye for detail, able to untangle and trace complicated matters. He has real expertise in welfare public law issues."
"Will is very technically competent and smart and he's very generous with his time."
"William is truly extraordinary. He is wonderful, clever, bright, and helps everyone in understanding the law."
"He is absolutely brilliant and is a very effective litigator for clients who don't have many options. He is very pragmatic, measured and reasonable - he appeals to common sense, which makes him an effective negotiator."
"William Ford is truly extraordinary - he helps everyone and knows the law better than anyone."
"Will Ford is a test case lawyer whose practice spans Social Housing and Welfare issues, his breadth of knowledge in both fields in invaluable to those working in his team."
"Osbornes’ team have grown in size and stature under the excellent leadership of Will Ford."
"Will Ford stands out as an exceptional and highly regarded lawyer in the field."
"The lawyer that was helping me with my case was William Ford was simply amazing – if a partner shows all these qualities, this must, I’m sure, filter down to the rest of the employees due to the example set."
"Will Ford recently took over a case from a departing colleague and was immediately on top of all the issues in a fact-heavy case; he is always available to speak to and in a case against a hard-to-manage litigant in person he was excellent."
"He is excellent - meticulous attention to detail and very knowledgeable."
“He is brilliant – he’s really intelligent and has great strategic capabilities.”
"The team at Osbornes is inspired by its leader Will Ford, a truly first-rate, modern lawyer’s lawyer. The team have blossomed under his Will and are now packed with conscientious, dedicated and excellent lawyers who always give their clients 100%."
"William Ford - A good technical lawyer with a strong commitment to his clients"
“Osbornes has an impressive social housing team and the quality of their work that I have seen is very high. Will Ford is a very well-regarded figure in the housing law world and leads a team of high quality and committed lawyers. The existence of family and property law teams at the firm, amongst others, means that they are able to offer a holistic and expert approach to their clients.”
William Ford is "highly committed to his clients and leaves no stone unturned in seeking to assist them with their problems"
William Ford "is an astute litigator, and his breadth of knowledge allows him to take a holistic approach to clients’ situations."
"He is one of the most passionate lawyers I've ever worked with. He's a rare commodity."
"William Ford frequently represents tenants in possession proceedings, homelessness appeals and disrepair claims... and is praised for his dynamic and hard-working approach."
"The absolutely brilliant William Ford."
William Ford receives effusive praise for his dedication and commitment to social housing. Interviewees highlight his technical understanding and background in housing law, and describe him as highly impressive."
'First-class lawyer' William Ford is 'completely dedicated to making a positive difference', and is acting in cases challenging the 'bedroom tax'.
William acts on possession, disrepair and homelessness cases, and has particular expertise in the protection of tenancy deposits under the Housing Act 2004
William Ford is impressive and devoted to the sector.
Related InsightsVIEW ALL
16.5.2022Immediate, Non-Deferrable and Unqualified
Judgment was handed down on 04 May 2022 in the Court of Appeal in an important case regarding the main housing duty....
Read more
5.11.2021Council overturns unlawful housing policy
Homeless teenager claims victory for more than 1,200 homeless people after forcing council to overturn unlawful housing policy A homeless teenager...
Read more
3.9.2021Homeless Teenager takes London Council to High Court
A homeless teenager is taking a London council to the High Court for ‘unlawfully’ banning hundreds of homeless people from...
Read more
19.8.2021Housing Disrepair Scandal in South London
Following an investigation by ITV nearly 500 homes in the Eastfields Estate in Mitcham, south London, owned by the housing association...
Read more
14.5.2021Possession Claims Amends Due to Pandemic
Last year I set out in two blogs the amendments implemented by the Government in the procedure for residential possession ...
Read more
8.4.2021Council to amend unlawful housing allocation banding process
For the last 8 years Brent Council has stopped the majority of homeless applicants from bidding for rehousing, treating them as ‘...
Read more
22.2.2021Trapped in your Home Lockdown or Not! – The...
Thousands of leaseholders are facing huge bills for safety improvements to their building after the Grenfell disaster. As a result...
Read more
29.1.2021What does the national lockdown mean for possession...
The coronavirus pandemic has caused disruption to all elements of life, and possession proceedings are no exception. The number of...
Read more
25.1.2021Hackney Council ignore vulnerable resident’s request
Paranoid schizophrenic ignored by Hackney Council for four years wins legal battle over unsafe front door A man who suffers...
Read more
25.1.2021Teenage asylum seeker wins legal battle against Council...
Vulnerable teenage asylum seeker wins age case against the council which unlawfully assessed him A vulnerable teenager who sought asylum...
Read more
23.12.2020EU Nationals with Pre-Settled Status entitled to benefits...
Court Judgment means EU Nationals with Pre-Settled Status can access benefits and housing On 18 December 2020 the Court of Appeal handed...
Read more- 2.12.2020
Education provision to age disputed migrants
The thorny issue of education provision to age disputed migrants There was an interesting article in The Guardian last week...
Read more - 24.11.2020
Is the delay in the Renters Reform Bill...
There have been issues tenants have faced for a long time before pandemic; namely no fault evictions and the other...
Read more - 20.11.2020
You are homeless because you are in shared...
It is well established that shared facilities are not suitable for families with children as long term accommodation. The client...
Read more - 20.11.2020
Up Up and away to the First Tier...
This year we assisted in written representations for a welfare benefit case in the Upper Tribunal. This is a Housing...
Read more 
24.8.2020Housing Lawyer at Osbornes comments on the government’...
Alex McMahon, expert housing lawyer in the housing and community care department at Osbornes has been quoted in various publications...
Read more
13.8.2020Judicial review – friend or foe?
The Government announced on 31st July 2020 that an independent panel has been asked to look at judicial review to consider...
Read more
24.7.2020Rejecting tenants on housing benefit deemed indirect discrimination
In a recent decision in the County Court at York it was held that a letting agent’s policy of...
Read more
27.5.2020I am vulnerable and homeless but the Council...
Homelessness law and procedure can be very complicated. We hope this blog gives you some helpful pointers but it is...
Read more- 5.5.2020
I have lost my job and I have...
The impact of the current pandemic is being felt by many, but the prospect of losing your job or not...
Read more - 4.5.2020
No recourse to public funds in the time...
Anyone working in the field of social welfare law will be familiar with the term “no recourse to public funds”....
Read more 
4.5.2020I am renting from a private landlord and...
I know that many individuals across the country are extremely worried about the instability of their housing. This was a...
Read more- 29.4.2020
Case news: Housing benefit decision addresses issue of...
The background You might be forgiven for thinking that the question of whether a course is full time or part...
Read more