Of Bad Character: Undue Influence Claim Succeeds

Katie de Swarte
older couple

Table of Contents

Naidoo v Barton: undue influence and the risks of mutual wills

Can someone’s bad character be used to prove a will was procured by undue influence? A recent decision is a textbook illustration of how a person’s conduct, ranging from criminal conduct to his general demeanour in court, resulted in a will being overturned.

The wills dispute solicitors at Osbornes Law regularly advise the parties on either side of contested wills. The team is highly experienced in helping to resolve the issues without expensive litigation.

What’s the background?

Mr and Mrs Naidoo were a wealthy couple who made joint wills in 1998. Mr Naidoo sadly died the following year. They had several children, but just one of them – David Barton – was appointed sole beneficiary and executor on the survivor’s death.

In 2018, Barton was sentenced to a lengthy prison term for fraud against wealthy care home residents. (He was also subject to a restraining order preventing him from disposing of, or devaluing his assets).

Unusually, the Naidoo’s wills were ‘mutual wills’ rather than mirror wills. Married couples typically opt for mirror wills which are essentially identical in terms. Typically, they leave their estates to each other, then to their children on the survivor’s death.

Mutual wills are almost the same as mirror wills, however, they also contain an agreement not to change or revoke the will without the other party’s consent, or after one of them dies. Mutual wills are not usually recommended unless there is an explicit reason for them.

Despite the 1998 wills being mutual wills, Mrs Naidoo made another will in 2015 appointing a different son (Charan) as her sole beneficiary and executor. She died a few months later and, needless to say, Barton was not happy to discover she had made a new will cutting him out.

Charan asked the court to rescind the 1998 will on grounds of his parents’ mistaken belief that the survivor would be free to alter their will; and on grounds of undue influence on Barton’s part.

The ‘mistake’ claim failed as Mrs Naidoo knew she would be permanently bound to the terms of the 1998 will. However, the judge ruled that it should be rescinded on the basis of undue influence.

Relevance of character

The judge said Barton’s conviction was “highly relevant”: he had used “sophisticated legal devices, including wills, contracts, spurious gifts, loans of transfers of land and other property to enrich himself at the expense of vulnerable persons who placed their trust in him and were… in his power”.

This “shows evidence of character, propensity, and ability to behave in the way described… and substantially undermines his credibility as a witness.” Furthermore, there was no evidence of a change in character.

The judge found Barton to be a charming man when he wanted to be, but when giving evidence he came across as narcissistic at times, with a degree of grandiosity and revealing a cold and ruthless streak. Any financial or other difficulties were, for instance, always somebody else’s fault entirely.

So how was this relevant to the 1998 mutual wills? Mr and Mrs Naidoo had been highly vulnerable at the time and relied on what the judge described as a “profound relationship of trust in and dependency on” Barton. He was responsible for his parent’s instructions for mutual wills – the effect of which was to leave the survivor “locked in” to having to trust Barton after the first of them died.

Only Barton would benefit from that, and his mother was afraid of him and “at his mercy”.

Legal advice is not enough

One argument put forward by Barton was that he and his parents had relied on independent legal advice in relation to the mutual wills. The judge gave this short shrift: “The mere fact that legal advice is obtained cannot suffice unless it is proper to infer that it must have led to a decision based upon full, free and informed thought”.

He found it unlikely that any independent legal advice, however competent and forceful, could have freed Mrs Naidoo from her vulnerability and Barton’s influence.

The contentious wills and probate lawyers at Osbornes are highly experienced in will disputes involving claims of undue influence. Get in touch for robust advice and representation by calling 020 7485 8811.


Share this article


Contact us today

For a free initial conversation call 020 7485 8811

Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you

    Related InsightsVIEW ALL

    1. international map and money

      Will Dispute Case Law

      New Births And New Relationships? Review Your Will To Avoid A Dispute You’d imagine a wealthy businessman with assets...

      Read more
    2. diamond held by tweezers

      Proprietary Estoppel Case Law

      On A Lick And A Promise? The First Hurdle In Proprietary Estoppel Claims Solicitors are increasingly instructed by clients who...

      Read more
    3. lady holding a cup

      Case Law: Dementia-Induced Mild Cognitive Impairment

      Dementia is a harsh reality for increasing numbers of families. Sadly, it means the disputed wills solicitors at Osbornes Law...

      Read more
    4. the moon

      How to prevent someone contesting a will

      It is fairly rare in my experience for a parent to write a child out of their will but that...

      Read more
    5. last will and testament disputes

      Contesting A Will Case Studies

      Will dispute on grounds of lack of capacity Our contesting a will solicitors acted for the claimants, the adult daughters...

      Read more
    6. scrap metal

      Evidence Needed When Contesting A Will

      ‘Scrap King’ Multi-million Inheritance Dispute Confirms the High Standard of Evidence Needed to Contest a Will   Gary Goodwin, son of...

      Read more
    7. couple holding hands

      Understanding Testamentary Capacity

      What is testamentary capacity? Testamentary capacity refers to a person’s ability, both legally and mentally, to create a valid...

      Read more
    8. toy houses on coins

      Contested Will Claim Against Estate Fails

      The recent reported case of Shearer v Shearer highlights that adult children cannot expect an estate to support their affluent...

      Read more
    9. hat on back shelf of car

      What is reasonable financial provision in 1975 Act claims?

      The long-running and high-profile case of Ilott v Mitson [2017] UKSC 17 has finally come to an end with the decision of...

      Read more
    10. older lady

      Undue Influence in Wills

      Vigilance Needed to Protect Those Vulnerable to Undue Influence The coronavirus pandemic has left many elderly and vulnerable people increasingly...

      Read more
    11. Last Will and Testament

      What Can I Do if I Have Been...

      I was left out of my mother’s last will. What can I do? Whilst testators in England and Wales...

      Read more