Do You Pay Child Maintenance if Your Ex is Cohabiting?

Contact
Table of Contents
Does cohabiting with a new partner affect child support? – Case Law
The case X v Y (Maintenance Arrears: Cohabitation) (2012) considered the definition of cohabitation. This was a case where the husband and wife entered into a consent order in 2007 which included the provision for periodical child maintenance payments to the wife; the same was to come to an end upon the wife’s cohabitation with a new partner for a period of 6 months or more.
Context of the Case
This is a term fairly often included in consent orders but less commonly ordered in contested proceedings. In February 2011 the husband concluded that the wife had been cohabiting for more than 6 months with her new partner and therefore stopped paying her maintenance. The wife subsequently applied for an order for back payment of the arrears.
Was the wife cohabiting with her new partner?
The consideration for the Judge was whether or not the wife was cohabiting with her new partner. The wife’s new partner had purchased a property in his sole name and the wife was living in the property. The wife contributed £50,000 to the purchase price, but the mortgage was in her new partner’s sole name and he was responsible for the mortgage payments. The wife had a tenancy agreement with her new partner and therefore paid rent to him. The new partner retained his own home and did not contribute to the household bills of the wife’s home.
Initial Judgment
In the first instance, the Judge placed emphasis on the case of Kimber v Kimber (2000) which set out a list of relevant factors to consider when deciding whether parties are cohabiting. That case suggested that the factors to consider are living together in the same household, sharing daily life, shared finances, sexual relationship, stability in the relationship, children, intention and motivation and finally the “opinion of the reasonable person with normal perceptions”. The Judge at first instance concluded that the wife and her new partner were not cohabitating because only 2 of the aforementioned relevant factors applied.
Appeal and Reversal
The husband appealed and it was held that the wife was cohabiting. This decision was made on the basis that the factors set out in Kimber v Kimber (2000) should not be used as an exhaustive checklist, but rather the Judge’s role is to look at all the evidence before them and come to a “common sense decision”. Each case is fact specific and therefore “there can be no cut and dry test” when considering whether a couple is cohabiting.
Final Decision
On appeal, it was decided that the wife was dependent on her new partner and that the wife’s partner had made a considerable financial contribution to the wife and her children.
Implications for Form E
Each party has an obligation in their Form E to outline their position in respect of cohabitation and remarriage and there is an obligation to provide details of the new partner’s financial situation within Form E. Many argue that cohabitation should have a greater impact on the financial claims of the cohabiting party, however, at present, the current authority states that cohabitation does not equate to remarriage which would terminate financial obligation. Therefore until there is legislative change cohabitation with a new partner can only constitute a change under s. 31(7) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 or possibly conduct which would be inequitable to disregard under s. 25(2)(g) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.
Judicial Discretion
Cohabitation is ultimately a matter for each Judge to consider in each case and use their discretion as to how much weight the cohabitation will have on the financial outcome of the case. What is obvious is that cohabitation is not an absolute bar to continued spousal maintenance and it does not provide an automatic entitlement to the non-cohabiting spouse to a greater share of the capital.
How we can help
If you are dealing with issues of cohabitation and maintenance payments, or need advice on how cohabitation can affect your financial rights, contact our experienced family lawyers today.
To speak with one of our solicitors, contact us by:
- Filling in our online enquiry form; or
- Calling us on 020 7485 8811
Share this article
Contact us today
Call us 020 7485 8811
Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you
Related InsightsVIEW ALL
- 27.8.2024
Pension Sharing Orders
Pension Sharing in Divorce With so many things to consider when dividing up your finances during a divorce or dissolution...
Read more - 1.8.2024
Common Law Partners
Common law partner meaning Common law marriage is the idea that two people who live together and act as if...
Read more - 25.7.2024
Cycling Accident Claims: Client Stories
Below are details of various cases handled by Osbornes specialist cycle accident claims team including the payouts clients have received...
Read more - 13.3.2024
Accident at Work Compensation Examples
Factory Worker Receives £14,000 for Hot Water Burns Our client was working in a food producing factory. He was injured when...
Read more - 4.12.2023
My spouse is going bankrupt. Will it affect...
Divorce and Bankruptcy In 2022, more than 1 in 10 businesses reported a moderate-to-severe risk of insolvency. More than one in five (22%) of...
Read more - 10.8.2023
Ambulance Delays Affecting Rapid Patient Treatment
Failure to Meet Ambulance Response Targets In 2017, the Secretary of State for Health accepted the new ambulance performance standards recommended...
Read more - 9.6.2023
High profile probate dispute of Vladimir Scherbakov
Probate dispute of Russian billionaire’s missing will You’d imagine a wealthy businessman with assets in different countries would...
Read more - 9.6.2023
Early Notification Scheme – is it helping or failing...
What is the Early Notification Scheme? The NHS Early Notification Scheme (“ENS”) has reached its sixth anniversary. Established in April 2017,...
Read more - 6.6.2023
Cyclists Claim After Hit-and-Run
Successful claim by cyclist injured after a hit-and-run In this hit-and-run claim, Our client had been playing volleyball in the...
Read more - 5.6.2023
Are pharmacy closures putting patients at risk?
It has been reported in the press that chemist closures will have an impact on patients living in deprived or...
Read more - 22.5.2023
Case Law: Dementia-Induced Mild Cognitive Impairment
Introduction Dementia is a harsh reality for increasing numbers of families. Sadly, it means the disputed wills solicitors at Osbornes...
Read more - 19.5.2023
Declaration of Trust for Property
If you are buying a property jointly, you may want to consider making a declaration of trust to record your...
Read more - 11.5.2023
Lease Extension Negligence
What is Lease Extension Negligence? Solicitors Negligence when a Tenant claims a new lease of a flat under the Leasehold...
Read more - 11.5.2023
Overlooking Nuisance Claims
The Supreme Court’s Ruling on Overlooking as Private Nuisance In the case Fearn v Tate (2023) UKSC 4, the UK Supreme...
Read more - 26.4.2023
German Court Rules on EU Succession Regulation
Succession laws vary from country to country which historically made the administration of cross-border estates potentially complex. Since 17 August 2015, the...
Read more - 21.4.2023
Success in Court of Appeal in child disability...
The Court of Appeal has today handed judgment in the case of Harrington v Secretary of State for Work and...
Read more - 11.4.2023
£250,000 settlement for client injured in forklift accident
Sophie Davies, a specialist personal injury lawyer at Osbornes Law, recently represented a client who suffered life-changing injuries following a...
Read more - 11.4.2023
Osbornes Instructed After Local Authority Data Breach
Osbornes Law has recently negotiated a settlement on behalf of two clients who had their personal information inadvertently released to...
Read more - 23.3.2023
Does Divorce Jurisdiction Matter?
Jurisdiction in divorce I am a family law practitioner with a large client following in England and in Gibraltar. I...
Read more - 23.3.2023
Private Pregnancy Scans and Substandard Care
In the news, it has been reported that private clinics that offer pregnancy scans to women are not meeting the...
Read more - 22.3.2023
Cohabitation Agreements
Unmarried couples who live together do not have the same legal protection as married couples and civil partners when they...
Read more - 22.3.2023
Breadwinner or homemaker in divorce. Does it matter?
Breadwinner vs Housewife Divorce Rights When it comes to deciding how wealth is split in a divorce, English courts do...
Read more - 22.3.2023
What is Parental Responsibility?
Understanding Parental Responsibility Parental responsibility is the legal term used to describe parents’ duties and responsibilities for their children. These...
Read more - 16.3.2023
Are trusts protected from divorce?
Can trusts protect an inheritance from your spouse? A trust is a separate legal entity. Neither spouse owns its assets....
Read more
Accreditations
"They are experienced and competent and have a long tradition and a good reputation. I only deal with them as a mediators."
Jonathan's calm but self-assured approach permeates the case from the start.
"Sam Collard is a very effective lawyer with great attention to detail on claims."
Osbornes has a skilled team of solicitors advising clients on a wide range of clinical negligence matters.
The firm has an excellent and innovative line in cases involving non-English speaking claimants, managed by recruiting paralegals with multi-language skills – an impressive route for expansion of the caseload.