UK Supreme Court Ruling regarding Secondary Victims in Clinical Negligence Cases
Contact
Stephanie Prior
Table of Contents
Introduction to the Supreme Court’s Decision on Secondary Victims in Clinical Negligence Cases
The Supreme Court has today, on the 11th January 2024, upheld the Court of Appeal’s order to dismiss the claims of secondary victims in Clinical Negligence cases in the matter known as Paul & Anor v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust [2024] UKSC 1. Secondary victims are considered to be those who are not subject directly to potentially negligent medical treatment but are witnesses to family members suffering injury or death as a consequence of it. In the three cases at issue before the Supreme Court, all claims were by family members for psychiatric illness caused by experiencing such events.
The Law Previously
Historically, in this area it has been the case that a person is unable to make a claim for any effect that the death or injury of another person has had on them. That said, case law has developed such that witnesses to an accident resulting from negligence have been permitted to make a claim for personal injury. The landmark case in this area is Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1991] UKHL 5, [1992] 1 AC 310, which arose from the Hillsborough disaster and specified five ‘control mechanisms’ – the criteria to be met for a successful claim by a secondary victim. Importantly, material to the Supreme Court’s decision today is the requirement for both physical and temporal proximity to the accident.
The Development and Limitations of Claims for Secondary Victims
To date, the question of whether this principle extends to cases of medical negligence has neither been addressed in legislation nor by the Supreme Court. Master of the Rolls, Sir Geoffrey Vos, in the Court of Appeal stated that, whilst he “can quite see why secondary victims in these cases ought to be seen to be sufficiently proximate to the defendants to be allowed to recover damages for their psychiatric injury”, he was bound by the previous decision in Taylor v A Novo (UK) Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 194. In that case it was held that, for such a claim by a secondary victim to succeed, the event and the negligence cannot be separate in time. It is this dichotomy that prompted the Master of the Rolls to leave the decision as to whether to depart from previous case law to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court’s Ruling and Its Implications
By a majority of six to one, the Supreme Court held that medical professionals owe a duty of care to their patients only and that witnessing the death of a close family member is not something doctors can be expected to prevent. Additionally, it was deemed that the claimant’s loved ones had not died in an ‘accident’. The Court gave varying definitions of the term but it can be encapsulated as a “discrete event in the ordinary sense of that word, meaning something which happens at a particular time, at a particular place, in a particular way”. It was further clarified that an accident is distinct from “medical crisis” such as occurred in these cases.
In effect, this ruling signifies an end to potential claims for psychiatric illness by secondary victims in clinical negligence cases. While this may bring clarity to the legal landscape, it also raises questions regarding the broader implications for victims of clinical negligence and their families. It could be argued that limiting the scope for secondary victims to claim compensation could hinder access to justice and overlook the profound emotional toll these incidents can have on the families involved.
Broader Implications and Future Directions for Secondary Victims
While the decision has a restrictive impact on secondary victims in matters of clinical negligence, the scope for secondary victims of other accidents, such as a Road Traffic Accident, has potentially increased. The Court held that secondary victims in such circumstances no longer need to show that the incident was ‘objectively horrifying’, or that the injury suffered by the secondary victim need be caused by ‘sudden shock’. This leaves the requirements to be met as follows; presence at the time of the accident or its aftermath, witnessing the accident or its aftermath, and a close tie of love and affection with the primary victim.
Contact Osbornes Law for legal advice
In light of this development, should you continue to have queries regarding your potential claim as a secondary victim or are uncertain as to how this precedent may be applicable to you, please contact us.
Share this article
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Call us 0207 485 8811
Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you
Profesjonalne i indywidualne podejście do mojej sprawy. Wydawało się niemożliwe uzyskać odszkodowanie, ale moja sprawa zakończyła pomyślnie dla mnie. Polecam gorąco wszystkim. Najlepsza porada w Londynie.
"Continues to receive a growing number of instructions from high-net-worth individuals, frequently with cross-border components, and advises on a steady flow of complex cohabitation matters, often involving large property portfolios."
“I would like to sincerely thank you for all the hard work in assisting me to resolve my rather unusual and complicated case. Last 2 years were very stressful and intensive and often only your professional approach and personal realistic but positive attitude helped me not to give up. The uncertainty weight of more than 10 years is off my shoulders thanks to you and your colleagues. Thanks once again for your legal advice, time, and efforts”.
"Osbornes has a superb reputation for its work in all areas of family law from pre and post nuptial agreements to unravelling complicated trusts and advising on other complex cross-border issues."
Jodi Newton has specific expertise regarding birth negligence cases, including those which involve cerebral palsy and Erb’s palsy injuries.
More Clinical Negligence InsightsVIEW ALL
10.8.2023Ambulance Delays Affecting Rapid Patient Treatment
Failure to Meet Ambulance Response Targets In 2017, the Secretary of State for Health accepted the new ambulance performance standards recommended...
Read more- 9.6.2023
Early Notification Scheme – is it helping or failing...
What is the Early Notification Scheme? The NHS Early Notification Scheme (“ENS”) has reached its sixth anniversary. Established in April 2017,...
Read more - 5.6.2023
Are pharmacy closures putting patients at risk?
It has been reported in the press that chemist closures will have an impact on patients living in deprived or...
Read more - 23.3.2023
Private Pregnancy Scans and Substandard Care
In the news, it has been reported that private clinics that offer pregnancy scans to women are not meeting the...
Read more 
14.2.2023The risk of extravasation injuries during iron infusion...
Many patients with low iron, particularly during pregnancy or postnatally, may be advised they need an iron infusion such as...
Read more
9.11.2022Delayed transfer to Accident & Emergency causing harm
The Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) has identified that patients may come at risk of harm whilst waiting in ambulances...
Read more- 9.11.2022
Breast cancer screening mammograms and negligence
Breast cancer screening has improved significantly in the UK due to research bettering the understanding of this terrible disease, which...
Read more - 28.9.2022
Women more likely to have symptoms ignored by...
An increasing number of women in the UK feel brushed off by GPs when presenting with real symptoms, with many...
Read more 
21.9.2022Are maternity services safe? – Part 2
In April last year I wrote a piece about government setting up a taskforce to look into why there are...
Read more
8.9.2022Poor interpretation of CTG can result in stillbirth...
Poor interpretation of a Cardiotocograph, more commonly known as a CTG, is a leading cause of stillbirth and brain injuries...
Read more- 9.8.2022
New interactive rating tool reveals NHS wait times...
Amidst record-breaking heatwaves and a lengthy patient waiting list due to COVID backlogs, it is not surprising that this summer...
Read more - 14.7.2022
Insulin overdose in hospitals due to limited staff...
A century ago, insulin was first used to treat a 14-year-old boy dying of type 1 diabetes. A hundred years later,...
Read more - 6.7.2022
NHS aims to reduce waiting times with Elective...
The NHS recently recorded their waiting list to be at 6.5 million, a record high. Much of this backlog is due...
Read more - 29.6.2022
Nottingham Maternity: Donna Ockenden to Chair Independent Inquiry
An interim report on the state of maternity services at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust has just been released. However,...
Read more - 23.2.2022
Record high waiting lists put cancer patient lives...
In early January 2022 there were nearly six million people in England waiting for routine operations and treatment: a record high....
Read more 
23.2.2022Women from ethnic minorities experience worse maternity care
It has been reported today that the government has set up a new task force to look into why there...
Read more- 17.2.2022
999 Call Handlers Maternity Instructions Report
HSIB Report on Maternity Pre-arrival Instructions from 999 Call Handlers The Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (“HSIB”) investigate NHS maternity incidents that...
Read more 
18.1.2022Basildon hospital maternity unit still needs improvements
A Channel 4 News investigation into the maternity scandal at Basildon Hospital, which is part of the Mid & South Essex...
Read more- 13.1.2022
Secondary Victim Claims
Court of Appeal Judgement on Secondary Victim Claims Judgment was today handed down by the Court of Appeal in the...
Read more 
15.12.2021Blood Clot Claims
Deep Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism and Blood Clot Claims Blood clots – general risks Blood clots are not uncommon and there...
Read more- 18.11.2021
How do I obtain my GP medical records...
If you want to obtain copies of your medical records from your GP or the hospital where you have been...
Read more - 17.11.2021
NICE revises guidelines on Induced labour
Most babies are born naturally at around 40 weeks gestation. However, some pregnancies continue for longer. According to data from the...
Read more 
12.11.2021Preventing lung cancer delayed diagnosis & misdiagnosis
The prevalence of lung cancer Lung cancer is one of the most common and serious cancers – sadly, it is often...
Read more
3.10.2021Sepsis – greater awareness can lead to better outcomes
In September, I attended the Brain Injury Group’s Sepsis training event in the City of London with my colleague,...
Read more
