How to set aside an order in financial remedy proceedings
Shivam Raja
Table of Contents
My ex-spouse didn’t tell the truth about their finances when we divorced, can anything be done?
Can the financial settlement from my divorce be set aside?
These are some questions you might be asking post-divorce. This post will look at how and when a court may be able to set aside an order in financial remedy proceedings.
There are three main grounds for setting aside a financial remedy order:
- Fraud or fraudulent non-disclosure
“Fraud unravels all” (Hale LJ, Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60). If it can be demonstrated that there was fraudulent non-disclosure during proceedings, then generally the court will set the order aside.
However, the exception is if the party accused of fraud can prove that the fraud would not have influenced a reasonable person to agree to the order; and that the court would not have made a significantly different order had it known at the time the order was made, what it knows now.
- Inadvertent or negligent non-disclosure of facts
If the court would have made a substantially different order, had it been aware of the non-disclosure, it will set aside the order.
In Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v Jenkins [1985] 1 AC 424, the wife did not disclose her engagement and subsequent remarriage at the time she entered into a consent order. This fact undermined the whole case.
To set aside the financial order, the negligent non-disclosure must be ‘material’ in nature. What is ‘material’ varies on a case-by-case basis. In subsequent cases, the court has provided some guidance as to what ‘material’ is. In the case of Gohil v Gohil [2015] UKSC 61, the court stated that where a party’s non-disclosure is inadvertent, there is no presumption that it was material and the onus is on the other party to show that proper disclosure would, on the balance of probabilities, have led to a different order. However, where a party’s non-disclosure is intentional, it is deemed to be material; it is presumed that proper disclosure would have led to a different order, unless that party can show, on the balance of probabilities, that it would not have done so (the case of Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60).
- Mistake
A mistake is where the court, through no fault of the parties, does not have the true facts at the time the order is made. The applicant must show that a substantially different order would have been made if the true facts were known.
The applicant must show that, at the time of making the original order:
- It was not their fault that the court did not have the true facts; and
- They could not have reasonably established the true facts.
The application to the court must be made reasonable promptly and should not prejudice third parties who have, in good faith, acquired any interests in property due to the subject matter of the original order.
Because of the caveats, the court is generally reluctant to set aside an order on the grounds of a mistake, although that does not mean it is impossible to do so.
If you would like to speak to a specialist in the family department, please contact Shivam, the trainee of Lisa Pepper or complete the online enquiry form below.
Share this article
Contact
Contact us today
For a free initial conversation call 020 7485 8811
Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you
Lisa Pepper is particularly recognised for her role as a mediator in complex cross-border disputes. Her practice also includes handling prenuptial agreements and issues arising from divorces. She is additionally skilled in Schedule 1 and other child arrangement matters.
Mark Freedman frequently takes on high-value financial and children proceedings that involve complex tax, trust and accounting issues.
"Andrew Watson is respected and tenacious in matrimonial finance. You would want him on your team."
"David Leadercrammer is such an experienced wonderful lawyer who you would want on the other side of your case. He’s sensible, pragmatic and hugely experienced in money and children cases."
Andrew secured me the best financial settlement for my claim. He is a credit to Osbornes Solicitors.
"Lisa Pepper was recommended to me as non-nonsense and able to help me with a difficult and confrontational divorce. She more than lived up to that – she was practical, collected and always available with a clear opinion and suggestions of how to move forwards. She also was open and helpful about costs and how to mitigate them"
"Mark Freedman is a very capable lawyer, renowned for not being a pushover and pushing his clients’ cases as much as he can, but will always talk sensibly about settlement. He is among the best – tenacious, good judgment and tactically aware."
"Mark Freedman is a dynamic and highly experienced family lawyer who fights extremely hard for his clients and is always in their corner, thus ensuring their loyalty and confidence. In a trial you would always want him on your side."
"She has impressed me as someone who fights my corner but also understands the importance of resolving issues without unnecessary escalation. She is calm and reassuring."
"Her mediation practice is exceptional; she is also a great solicitor and has a breadth of skill which is really useful."
"He is really experienced and wise. He has a lovely manner about him and clients feel safe with him."
"Jo Wescott is top notch and widely recognised as a rising star throughout the profession. She brings a winning combination of great judgement, an immense work ethic, and a relaxed and charming way with opponents and clients alike. Someone you want on your side”
"Osbornes is pre-eminent for family law in North London. Mark Freedman is a real rainmaker. He is an excellent lawyer and has a top-notch practice"
Mark Freedman is intelligent and personable and has a good selection of high-net work cases.
"Exceptional value for money. Highly competent and reasonably priced. Mark Freedman: one of the best in the field."
"Client-focused. Ready to fight the clients’ corner, but also ready where possible to steer client from unnecessary dispute. Mark Freedman – very experienced, with good instinct for the eventual result. Clients love him and he thinks ahead and directs the client to the best result for the client."
Mark Freedman is a serious player. A fearless family law litigator, who protects his clients’ interests passionately.
Breadth of knowledge and willingness to go the extra mile is what makes it stand out. Mark Freedman – devoted to his clients
Mark Freedman frequently takes on high-value financial and children proceedings that involve complex tax, trust and accounting issues. Sources praise the "tenacity and common sense" he brings to challenging disputes.
"Mark is very experienced, competent, good with clients and takes a sensible approach to cases. He knows exactly what he's doing."
"An exceptional outfit. They take on difficult cases, fight hard and win."
"The team frequently deals with cross-border estates for high–net-worth individuals."
"Mark Freedman is a real heavyweight litigator who has dealt with some very significant cases."
"Mark Freedman boxes clever, keeps his powder dry and when it comes to the end game he negotiates a really good deal."
"Mark Freedman has a specific focus on high-net-worth divorces and finance cases where there are overseas assets and trusts."
"Lisa Pepper somehow manages to get parties to settle on matters where there isn’t much hope to start out with."
"Well-regarded family practice assisting clients with substantial matrimonial disputes and sensitive children proceedings."
"Mark Freedman draws acclaim for his work in high net worth divorce cases, including those involving company structures, family trusts and overseas assets."
"He never gives up. He fights for you to the end and has boundless energy."
Mark Freedman advises high-net-worth clients and knows his stuff.
Highly regarded for his experience as a litigation and mediation expertise, Mark Freedman is tenacious and determined. Clients really feel that he is fighting their corner.
Andrew handled a very complex, 3 year legal battle for me, with a tremendous amount of patience and professionalism. He is very approachable, always kept me up to date, by phone and e-mail, and responded very quickly to my queries with excellent advice, sound strategic thinking and strong letters to put the other side under pressure. With top contacts for barristers, joint experts and mediation.
[The Family Law department] handles significant matrimonial finance cases and complex nuptial agreements. Respected for its expertise in cross-border children law matters.
Mark Freedman represents high net worth clients in complex financial disputes. Sources say that "he's a determined negotiator who'll always do the very best for his clients.
"Mark Freedman receives a lot of instructions from clients based abroad, often relating to complex divorce proceedings. Sources say: “His main strengths are his enthusiastic passion for the job in hand and his total dedication to his clients.”
Related Insights VIEW ALL
22.3.2023Does it matter if you’re a breadwinner...
When it comes to deciding how wealth is split, English courts do not discriminate based on your role within the...
Read more
16.3.2023Are trusts protected from divorce?
Can trusts protect an inheritance from your spouse? A trust is a separate legal entity. Neither spouse owns its assets. ...
Read more
16.3.2023Is a limited company protected from divorce?
Is my spouse entitled to half of my business? If you are involved in running a limited company, then it...
Read more
16.3.2023How is a pension split in a divorce?
Pensions and Divorce In a divorce, pensions are taken into account together with all other financial assets. Once all assets...
Read more
16.3.2023Who gets the house in a divorce?
How is a house divided in a UK divorce? For most people contemplating divorce, one of the main concerns will...
Read more
30.8.2022Pension sharing on divorce
What is the new procedure for pension sharing? Pensions are one of the biggest assets of a marriage, yet many...
Read more
6.5.2022My ex has cut me off during divorce
Can my spouse cut me off financially? Unfortunately, it is far too common that when a client says it’s...
Read more
6.5.2022Divorce Loans
How the Court views loans from parents during divorce A frequent issue in financial divorce cases is a loan from...
Read more
5.5.2022Mesher Orders Explained
What is a Mesher order? A Mesher Order allows the sale of the family home to be postponed in a...
Read more
11.4.2022Private Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) for Divorce
Private FDR helps divorcing couples reach a financial settlement Our specialist divorce lawyers are keen to ensure our divorcing clients...
Read more
9.12.2021Negotiating financial settlements in divorce
Costly and acrimonious divorces: a lesson in what not to do If you’re determined to pursue your financial claims...
Read more
16.11.2021Uncovering hidden assets in your divorce
Hiding Assets During a Divorce As part of your divorce, you and your ex will have to agree on how...
Read more
9.11.2021Case Law Divorce Settlement
6 cases that shape your divorce settlement Part of what makes our divorce lawyers experts in their field is knowing what...
Read more
10.9.2021Does Divorce Revoke A Will?
Divorce and Wills In the midst of a divorce or separation, it’s rare for couples to think about making...
Read more
10.8.2021Beneficial Interest in Property
Andrew Watson, a London-based divorce lawyer in our family department and Resolution accredited cohabitation lawyer, summarises the law in relation...
Read more
27.4.2021Divorce in your 60s – The Financial Implications
How common is a divorce in your 60s? The latest divorce figures from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) show...
Read more
18.2.2021Tax and Divorce
Tax implications for divorcing couples As the end of the Stamp Duty holiday looms on 31 March 2021, that is not the...
Read more
6.4.2020Setting aside a financial remedy order
What has been the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on financial remedy orders? Can you do it at all? Barder...
Read more
4.9.2019Calderbank Offers
The Resurrection of Calderbank Offers When a couple divorces, they are encouraged by the Courts to consider other dispute resolution...
Read more
13.8.2019Bankruptcy and Divorce
Will my spouse declaring bankruptcy affect my divorce settlement? The case of Hayes v Hayes (2012) EWHC (Ch) (Chancery Division (23.03.12) (unreported...
Read more- 25.3.2019
Self-Help in Financial Remedy Proceedings
One of the first things we explain to clients who are getting divorced is that, when it comes to financial...
Read more - 25.3.2019
Effect of Delay on Financial Relief Claims: Vince...
Wyatt v Vince This unusual case demonstrates the risks of failing to bring a financial claim on divorce promptly, or,...
Read more - 17.7.2018
Supreme Court Hands Down Judgement in Mills v...
The Supreme Court today handed down judgement in the case of Mills v Mills, setting aside the order made by...
Read more